Skip to content
Law

Sackett v Spindler

The case of Sackett v Spindler, 248 Cal.App.2d 220, 56 Cal. Rptr. 435 (Cal. Ct. App. 1967), is a landmark ruling in contract law that highlights the consequences of breaching contractual obligations and the legal… Sackett v Spindler

Law

Haase v Cardoza

The case of Haase v Cardoza, 165 Cal.App.2d 35, 331 P.2d 419 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958), is a significant legal precedent in contract law, particularly regarding the enforceability of oral promises and the fundamental necessity… Haase v Cardoza

Law

Lonergan v Scolnick

The case of Lonergan v Scolnick, 129 Cal. App. 2d 179, 276 P.2d 8 (Cal. Ct. App. 1954), is a significant decision in contract law, particularly in understanding the distinction between an offer and an… Lonergan v Scolnick

Law

Daniels v Williams 

The U.S. Supreme Court case Daniels v Williams, 474 U.S. 327 (1986), serves as a landmark ruling clarifying the relationship between governmental negligence and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case addresses… Daniels v Williams 

Law

Knight v Jewett

The California Supreme Court in Knight v Jewett, 3 Cal. 4th 296 (1992), addressed the interplay between the comparative negligence doctrine established in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. of California and the assumption of risk… Knight v Jewett

Law

Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc.

Facts of Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc. Provide Commerce, Inc. (the defendant) operates ProFlowers.com, an online retailer specializing in floral arrangements. Brett Long (the plaintiff) placed an order for a floral arrangement on ProFlowers.com, which… Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc.

Law

Holmes v Lerner

Facts of Holmes v Lerner Patricia Holmes and Sandra Kruger Lerner orally agreed to start a cosmetics company named Urban Decay. Their collaboration aimed to develop unconventional nail polish colors with an urban theme. Holmes… Holmes v Lerner