Skip to content

Mitchill v. Lath (1928)

Mitchill v. Lath, 247 N.Y. 377 (1928), is a leading case on the parol evidence rule and the concept of contract integration. The decision by the Court of Appeals of New York addresses whether an… Mitchill v. Lath (1928)

Masterson v. Sine

The case of Masterson v. Sine is a significant decision by the Supreme Court of California that explores the scope of the parol evidence rule and the concept of contract integration. The dispute arose from… Masterson v. Sine

Kingston v. Preston (1773)

Kingston v. Preston (1773) is a foundational case in contract law that explains when one party may refuse to perform their contractual obligation because the other party has not fulfilled a required condition. The case… Kingston v. Preston (1773)

Krell v. Henry (1903)

Krell v. Henry (1903) is one of the most important cases in contract law because it established the doctrine of frustration of purpose. This legal principle applies when an unexpected event destroys the main reason… Krell v. Henry (1903)