Citation: 19 Cal.2d 807, 122 P.2d 892 (1942) Court: Supreme Court of California Procedural History of Bernhard v Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association Helen Bernhard, as administratrix of Clara Sather’s estate, filed… Bernhard v Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association

This case, Cooper v Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., centers around whether the trial court wrongly struck the Coopers’ expert witness testimony and reversed the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. Here’s my analysis of… Cooper v Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc

The case of Lhotka v Geographic Expeditions, Inc. addresses the enforceability of arbitration agreements in contracts of adhesion. Specifically, it focuses on procedural and substantive unconscionability in the context of consumer contracts. This legal dispute… Lhotka v Geographic Expeditions, Inc

The case of Ortega v Kmart Corp. is a landmark decision regarding the duty of care owed by storeowners to their customers in maintaining safe premises. This case illustrates the principles surrounding premises liability, constructive… Ortega v Kmart Corp

The case Bussard v Minimed, Inc. discusses the scope of the respondeat superior doctrine, specifically its application to workplace-created risks that extend into an employee’s commute. This case is significant in addressing an exception to… Bussard v Minimed, Inc. (2003)

Hernandez v County of San Bernardino examines the extent of immunity under the Eleventh Amendment for a county acting as an arm of the state. Pedro Hernandez, a resident of Monterey County, suffered financial distress… Hernandez v County of San Bernardino (2004)

The case of Valley Medical Specialists v Farber addressed critical issues regarding the enforceability of non-competition clauses in employment contracts, particularly in the context of medical professionals. The Arizona Supreme Court evaluated the balance between… Valley Medical Specialists v Farber

State v Bocharski highlights critical issues in criminal trials, particularly regarding the admissibility of evidence and the importance of fairness in capital sentencing proceedings. The Arizona Supreme Court’s decision underscores the need for courts to… State v Bocharski

Jones v Flowers is a seminal case in due process jurisprudence, emphasizing the state’s obligation to take meaningful steps to notify property owners of actions affecting their property rights. The Court’s ruling balances government efficiency… Jones v Flowers