Skip to content
Law

Haase v Cardoza

Citation: 165 Cal.App.2d 35, 331 P.2d 419 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958) Facts of Haase v Cardoza In Haase v Cardoza, the plaintiff and appellant, Rose Haase, sought to recover two sums of money from the… Haase v Cardoza

Law

Bicycle Laws in Nevada

Nevada, known for its bustling urban centers and scenic roadways, has witnessed a growing number of cyclists in recent years. While cycling offers numerous health and environmental benefits, it also comes with certain responsibilities and… Bicycle Laws in Nevada

Law

Taylor v Vallelunga

The case of Taylor v Vallelunga is a landmark decision from the California Court of Appeal that defines the essential legal principles for claims of emotional distress, especially in cases where no physical harm is… Taylor v Vallelunga

Law

Kovacik v Reed

Case Citation: Kovacik vs. Reed, 49 Cal.2d 166, 315 P.2d 314 (Cal. 1957) The case Kovacik v Reed addresses an important legal question in partnership and joint venture law: whether a partner who contributes only… Kovacik v Reed

Law

Swartzbaugh v Sampson

Citation 11 Cal. App. 2d 451, 54 P.2d 73 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936) Facts of Swartzbaugh v Sampson Swartzbaugh v Sampson is a landmark case in property law concerning the rights of joint tenants in… Swartzbaugh v Sampson